Soon there will be a chapter on a nice book on that :)
Levente and Lukas,
You both agree that this is not a bug, them we have to ascertain that 'average Smalltalker' will understand that using closures in Pharo changes the Smalltalk language definition.
Em 17/01/2010 06:57, Lukas Renggli < renggli@gmail.com > escreveu:
I believe this is a bug.
That's the correct behavior. This is exactly how closures should behave. The variable declaration is outside the block you store thus one variable slot is shared among multiple block definitions inside. See ClosureTests for more examples of that behavior.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project