On 2 January 2011 10:37, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2011, at 1:33 AM, csrabak@bol.com.br wrote:
I would like to add to the tally. Changing Object>>copyFrom: to Object>>copyStateFrom: makes for me a lot more sense that changing (in fact by the creation of) OrderedCollection>>copyFrom: to OrderedCollection>>copyFromIndex:
Except we do agree /in limine/ that OrderedCollection>>copyFrom:to: should be changed to OrederedCollection>>copyFromIndex:toEndIndex:
This is the problem I thought about it. so I think that we will have to stay with copyFrom:
For the future, I think that the functionality of #copyFrom:to: should be provided by #at: using an interval/collection as argument (something that is pretty common in about any modern programming language). For now #copyFrom:to: is part of ANSI and should not be touched. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch