Are the VM changes you mention the ones that exist now in the Linux VM? ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Serge Stinckwich [serge.stinckwich@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:16 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] SerialPort - named ports on Linux To be tested : http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1057 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
Hello all,
I recalled seeing mention of the Linux vm's now supporting named ports, and I found the code for that, at least in the vm. My understanding gets fuzzy as we enter the plugin and primitives. At a minimum, there are a few ByName methods to be added, and Squeak 4.1 contains open and close methods that test on type (int vs. string) to open or close by name or not as appropriate.
Is this as simple as gathering the changes and adding them to Pharo, or does it require VMMaker magic?
Bill
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project