Yuriy can you check with JB because he told me that he wrote a configuration for Wooden. Stef Le 12/6/15 13:48, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :Yuri
Just a quick side note:
my initial email was kind of a troll. Because when you ask for something about roassal and 3D, you get a reply about Roassal-Woden i.e. Roassal3D is not supported anymore, you have to use Woden instead. Now when you have to load Woden, you canât so you have to use the uber-long script on the Woden project page instead of conf. Thatâs why Iâve joked about using scripts instead of Metacello.
Uko
On 12 Jun 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 Jun 2015, at 10:40, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 12-06-15 10:24, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
it was just an example of why using #stable in project dependences is a bad idea :) you made #releaseN.N to fix precisely my point. there should exist something like I say â3.*â #'release3' always refers to the latest stable 3.*.*.* I know :) Iâm just saying that I would like to have that as a standard mechanism, not a convention.
Esteban
Iâm sorry for being obvious here, I know this is known⦠problem is that Iâve seen far too much the use of metacello not for doing releases but to handle commits. I think it mostly has to do with the need to have exact reproducible builds (which is different from the need to have working software). That would be better handled with a (separate) SnapshotOf class i.m.o.
Stephan