I don't think that the current code of OB still runs in Squeak. It doesn't even work in older versions of Pharo. Lukas On Friday, June 12, 2009, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
But for example, OB must work in Squeak also, not only Pharo. If we fork OB we will then merge both of them.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Michael Roberts <mike@mjr104.co.uk> wrote: At some point does it make sense to move the tools (OB etc) into the core so that we don't have folk working around them not being there? I don't believe such fragmentation of tools helps us long term. Thanks Mike On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Frederic Pluquet <fpluquet@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
Hello Alex,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre@bergel.eu> wrote:
Hi Frederic,
It looks really good. I tried to used it instead of the Explorer. Few comments: Â Â Â Â Â - Unfolding a branch that contains an element with a very very long printOn: seems to freeze the system. Ok, I should limit the size of the generated string (with ... at the end).
I got an error niDescription not found. Do you have an example I can reproduce ?
    - I spend a lot of time in unfolding branches to see field content. Maybe field values could be displayed without having to unfold ? Good idea. I'll see what I can do. Cheers, Fréd
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch