Sept. 19, 2015
9:48 a.m.
On 19 Sep 2015, at 11:40, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
There is no reason to expect that files.pharo.org links will not rot away for such unusual content. Also I'm pretty sure that copying it there is against copyright; this however also applies for Web Archive (plus the owner of the domain can retroactively remove content from Web Archive). So why not just put there the name of the article (and it's DOI), which is sufficient to always trace the article (just like any reference in any article), and have the regular link for convenience?
Yes, that is the way to go.
Peter
p.s.: pharo.com is a hedge fund ;)
They had enough money to buy the domain⦠Marcus