As I mentioned on squeak-dev... With the StandardToolSet I get 300ms or less... Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou@gmail.com> To: "Pharo Development" <pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>; "David Röthlisberger" <roethlis@iam.unibe.ch> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:22 PM Subject: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Usability and look-and-feel(was Re: The future ofSqueak & Pharo (was Re: [ANN] Pharo MITlicenseclean))
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab@gmx.de> Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:40 PM Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: Usability and look-and-feel (was Re: The future ofSqueak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT licenseclean)) To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org>
[ToolSet default browse: Behavior selector: nil] timeToRun.
On my box this takes 506 msecs in Squeak 3.10, using Pharo it's at 5020 msecs. That's 10x slower.
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project