Hi, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> writes:
I wish the commits were much more atomic than they currently are...
I agree. This is important (and one of my research topics https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01116225 :-)). Martin Dias worked on EpiceaUntangler to help developers do atomic commits http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MartinDias/EpiceaTaskClusterer. To put that in production, we need the Random Forest algorithm implemented in Pharo.
I can still open a fresh Pharo image and browse and review the whole code snapshot there. Or I can navigate more easily in history with git tools. But if I wanted a lightweight review thru web, focusing on the diffs and navigating a bit in history without replicating the repository, I can't.
Skip is working on a code review tool. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill