Nov. 24, 2010
1:22 p.m.
I see well your problem. We want to have symbol without getting with it the parser and compiler. three questions - can we package isLiteralSymbol: with compiler? - what are the senders? - else do we have an alternate implementation not relying on scanner? Stef
Hello,
I wonder why the method isLiteralSymbol: is in the Scanner methodDict instead of the Symbol (or maybe String) one ?
Moreover there is no reference to self or variable in this method ...
And due to this method, there is a dependence between Symbol and Scanner (and then the Compiler)
Thank you for answering another one of my noob questions ^^
Ben