Ok, thanks for the answer Lukas. Then i would ask the O2 developers, why is the fork needed? Just curious, because if 02 copies a lot from OB, to add more functionality why that extra features cant be part of OB? My point is that i don't understand if OB is no extensible enough for building O2, or just because it was easier to fork. Many thanks, Fernando On Jan 20, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
O2 is a fork of OB.
The duplication of the complete code-base is necessary, because O2 makes incompatible changes to the OmniBrowser framework. The way O2 is implemented makes it impossible to run both together on the same core model without conflicts.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project