2015-03-04 10:16 GMT+01:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
Le 4 mars 2015 09:51, "Thierry Goubier" <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> a écrit :
2015-03-04 9:22 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Here is a little rant about DVCS that I came across:
Unorthodocs: Abandon your DVCS and Return to Sanity
http://bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity...
What struck my attention was that this guys (1) knows what he is
talking about and (2) recognises both Smalltalk and Monticello explicitly as ancestors !
Interestingly, one of the things he is discussing is the versionning of external data (blobs).
This also shows that not all is fun and jolly in git(hub) land.
Of course. We do with what we have (and what is popular) :)
Still, the full local github history, the ability to push to several repos and the surrounding ecosystem makes it very fine. No one is forced to branch on every single feature... I have been coming back from that for example.
I agree. What I'd add to the git benefits is a fairly good merge algorithm as well.
master and develop with a couple tags do the trick.
One of the good things is the flexibility it offers. Thierry
Phil
Thierry