I will just re-post my first answer: if reintroduce them means reintroduce them hardcoded as before, then Iâm complete against it and I WILL NOT integrate such solution. Iâm sorry for being so strong here, but previous implementation was lame and we need to get rid of them. Now, I understand people are used to use those bindings and also some others (no idea which ones because I never used them⦠for me ocompletion is good enough⦠but those are tastes). So I would be very happy to integrate a generic way to define keybindings and outputs (which is already there, with keymapping, but I mean an editor or something), and I would be very happy to integrate a default configuration (which of course, will include #ifTrue:/##ifFalse:) Esteban
On 03 Aug 2016, at 10:30, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-08-03 10:27 GMT+02:00 Guille Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com <mailto:guillermopolito@gmail.com>>: I'm also against.
- They take a place in the shortcuts that prevents others to use it - If lazy people really needs this, the code completion should be enhanced. This is a code completion concern...
+1