Thanks Cédrick. May be the right comment is: See URI ? Laurent. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdrick65@gmail.com> wrote:
part taken from URI class comment:
"A hierarchical URI is either an absolute URI whose scheme-specific part begins with a slash character, or a relative URI, that is, a URI that does not specify a scheme. Some examples of hierarchical URIs are:
http://www.pharo-project.org/home file:///~/calendar
A hierarchical URI is subject to further parsing according to the syntax [scheme:][//authority][path][?query][#fragment] where the characters :, /, ?, and # stand for themselves. The scheme-specific part of a hierarchical URI consists of the characters between the scheme and fragment parts.
The authority part of a hierarchical URI is, if specified, either server-based or registry-based. A server-based authority parses according to the syntax [user-info@]host[:port] where the characters @ and : stand for themselves. Nearly all URI schemes currently in use are server-based. An authority part that does not parse in this way is considered to be registry-based.
The path component of a hierarchical URI is itself said to be absolute if it begins with a slash character ('/'); otherwise it is relative. The path of a hierarchical URI that is either absolute or specifies an authority is always absolute."
Le 4 mai 2011 à 21:20, laurent laffont a écrit :
Today: HierarchicalURI
Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment Rules: #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest
Laurent