+1 Am 30.12.2013 um 17:30 schrieb Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo@gmail.com>:
If Linus Torvald is your model, then I quit Pharo :P
Ben
On 30 Dec 2013, at 17:12, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
please donât. Democracy does not make sense. Do you think that linus is taking into account democracy vote when fixing core of linux?
Stef
Since we can inject javascript in fogbugz, we should give a try to add a voting system :P
Ben
On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:12, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 29 Dec 2013, at 23:34, btc@openinworld.com wrote:
Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
thatâs usually done by the integrators, but nothing prevents you to do it :)
I thought wider community involvement was encouraged for anyone to provide the peer review to move items to status Resolved Fix To Include with the integrators then moving it to status Resolved Fix Included (and then usually straight to Closed status)
Yes, but for a real working system we would need a voting schemeâ¦
right now it matters not much as everything is manual, but of it would be automatic, it would be nice to have something like âtwo people who are commuters say itâs goo then it is good to be integrated automaticallyâ.]
Right now the idea is that people can set the âfix to includeâ if they are 150% sure that is is a good change. Itâs better to just add a note to the âfix review neededâ so then someone else will say âhe thinks itâs good, I double checked, so itâs goodâ.
So, in short: we need a better system, but for now it kind of works.
Marcus