May 20, 2009
6:39 a.m.
do you have a scenario for it? And I agree with lukas about value on Object Stef On May 20, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Given that in Pharo we have Symbol>>value:, are there any reasons not to have also
Symbol>>value: anObject value: anotherObject ^ anObject perform: self with: anotherObject
?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project