Hi Rajula, On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:38:42PM -0700, Rajula Vineet wrote:
Hi Alistair,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alistair Grant [via Smalltalk] <ml+[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 7:29 PM To: Rajula Vineet Reddy(IMT2014045) Subject: Re: The new implementation of current working directory
Hi Rajula,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:42:02AM -0700, Rajula Vineet wrote:
> Hi all, > > As I have already been posting about my GSoC work and updates on my blog > <https://vineetreddy.wordpress.com> and on the mailing list > <<a href="http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro= search_page&node=1294792&query=gsoc+Rajula+&days=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow" id="LPlnk372500" previewremoved="true">http:// forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=search_page&node=1294792& query=gsoc+Rajula+&days=0> > . In this post, I would like to go in depth of my work on 'the working > directory' so that I can get valuable feedback and suggestions from > everyone. This discussion was started on an github PR > <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/96> which was conflicting my > PR.
It looks like my concerns were unfounded, but many thanks for taking the trouble to follow up on this.
Not a problem. Indeed thanks for making me do it. I got to learn something new and improved my knowledge on this issue.
It would good if you could keep a similar caching strategy to the one I introduced as the performance gains can be significant (as suggested by Cyril's comment).
Yeah. Sure. I have used the same caching strategy and made changes to my pull request.
Thanks again, Alistair
Thank you, Rajula
Great! I'm looking forward to updating my scripts to use this instead of my current hack. Thanks again, Alistair