Why not something like bindKeyCombination:toAction: ? Ben On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
excellent so how do we integrate this change?
I will chnage the chapter on keymapping :)
On Jun 18, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
I prefer the onKeyCombination* because of the following rationale:
- to me a shortcut is the association between a key combination and an action - a key combination is a combination of keys :), which is associated with an action
Stef, so far I changed the asShortcut => asKeyCombination, following the same idea :).
Guille
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:21 PM, GOUBIER Thierry <thierry.goubier@cea.fr> wrote:
The problem with onkeypress, onkeydown, onkeyup is that they are low-level events compared to the shortcuts we are talking about.
A shortcut is at least one key, but is usually a key + a modifier or a sequence of key + modifiers (such as the emacs ^X ^C ($x ctrl, $c ctrl). The Keymapping stuff sits a lot higher than the basic keypress events (which do exist as well) and can recognize multi-keys combinations. If you call that onKeyPress:do:, then you loose in the name part of the power of it.
Hence the onKeyCombination:do: (but I prefer onShortcut:do:)
onShortcut:do: looks good to me.
Stef
Thierry ________________________________________ De : Pharo-dev [pharo-dev-bounces@lists.pharo.org] de la part de Esteban A. Maringolo [emaringolo@gmail.com] Date d'envoi : mardi 18 juin 2013 18:14 Ã : Pharo Development List Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] on:do: for shortcuts?
2013/6/18 Clément Bera <bera.clement@gmail.com>
On Javascript, there are :
onkeypress onkeydown onkeyup
I think we should have same API than other languages, especially popular ones. So 1 of these 3 would be the best for me.
Why not onKeyPress:do: ?
+1 to each of the last two statements.