+1 -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-bounces@lists.pharo.org] Per conto di Max Leske Inviato: giovedì 4 luglio 2013 12:58 A: Pharo Development List Oggetto: Re: [Pharo-dev] Abbreviations I agree wholeheartedly! I still believe in (mostly) self documenting code and that cannot be achieved by using abbreviations. Max On 04.07.2013, at 12:52, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Usually I thought only the C/C++ people fell in love with abbreviations - but now its our own community:
in Pharo 3.0 one can write:
Smalltalk os env
or would it be better to use:
Smalltalk operatingSystem environment
in the future?
So is the current
Smalltalk vm
better than
Smalltalk virtualMachine
I know: even a newcomer should know what "OS" means. At least Smalltalkers/Java people should know they need a "VM". But nonetheless I think a common goal would be to keep Pharo code and method selectors readable and avoid abbreviations when possible.
Also there are Pharo methods like #getEnv: instead of #getEnvironmentVariable: (interesting that they wrap the native C/C++ API "GetEnvironmentVariableA" which does not use abbreviations)
Should we care (with an issue) and use the more readable forms in the future and deprecated the abbreviation forms?
Or will we keep abbreviations for the lazy and easier typing?
If you comment please think about the goal to get readable code, the goal to get more newcomers into programming and your own first steps with Smalltalk and IT ...