As far as I remember, the scripting syntax of GNU Smalltalk is very close to the changeset's. I think that the syntax is not the most relevant part of this work. What is critical in my opinion, is to have a robust scripting facility. I do not want to use jruby to do the scripting I need to do. Cheers, Alexandre On 20 Jan 2009, at 15:43, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:23:28PM +0100, Gwenael Casaccio wrote:
I've published an initial release of Pharo scripting you cant get this release here : http://www.squeaksource.com/SaphirScripting. I would like to thanks *Mathieu Suen* who has done a very good work and give me a lot of help !!!
Is the scripting syntax the same as used by Gnu Smalltalk? It would be convenient to have the same syntax work on both
-- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.