Re: [Pharo-project] what are the comments of cull: cull: cull:cull: and friends?

this is a convenience methods On 17 August 2011 23:29, Philippe Marschall <kustos@gmx.net> wrote:

On 17.08.2011 22:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

I wrote

cull: anArg       "Execute the receiver with one or zero argument.

      [ 1 + 2 ] cull: 5               returns 3       [ :x | 1+ 2 + x] cull: 5               returns 8       "       ^numArgs = 0               ifTrue: [self value]               ifFalse: [self value: anArg]

So it's like #valueWithPossibleArgument:? Why do we need two methods that do the same thing?

Cheers Philippe

-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.