well we are not all on windows :) so an FAQ entry is the most appropriate action. stef On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Robert Kovacic wrote:
Given Microsoft Security Essentials is free, it's reasonable to assume that over time a significant percentage of Windows machines will have it installed. It would be a shame if people new to or evaluating Pharo were turned off by a known issue that so severely affects performance but has such a simple solution.
I would go so far as to suggest that a message be displayed in the Workspace of the fresh downloaded image for this (and any other similar issues).
Regards, Robert Kovacic
Henrik Johansen wrote:
On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:23 34AM, Robert Kovacic wrote:
I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List?
Seems like an issue more suited in a FAQ or something to me, not much we can really do do "fix" it... Maybe http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/faq/pharo deserves an entry about this?
Cheers, Henry
Robert Kovacic wrote:
I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the problem thank you.
Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with NOD32 (and any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the changes file and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the Pharo directory from the scan list.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <rjk@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3773622.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project