Hi Esteban, thanks for explanation. Uko On 07 Apr 2014, at 13:21, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Yuri,
is no-issue and no-work in progress: is like that by design. extensions are package related and not tag related. so⦠you can name an extension MyPackage-B, but it will still be going to rpackage extensions.
one of the things we need to continue improving is protocols⦠now they are objects (before they were just strings), but extensions are still name matching conventions, and they should be also objects (like ExtensionProtocol) or something like that. but well⦠future stuff.
Esteban
On 07 Apr 2014, at 05:54, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
Now we have tags for packages in Pharo 3, and itâs very cool. So if I select a tag âAâ in âMyPackageâ I will see all classes from category âMyPackage-Aâ. On the other hand if Iâm extending another class with a protocol â*MyPackage-Bâ I canât see that class under the âBâ tag. Is this some kind of issue or itâs still a work in progress.
Cheers. Uko