I imagine that quite well :) but my love/hate relationship with trait always bugs me :) On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
If you put all methods from ClassDescriptions in traits and move them on Class and Metaclass there is no need for ClassDescription.
If previously you want something that inherited from ClassDescription you can simply include the traits now.
In the case of a Behavior subclass nothing changes.
On 2013-07-13, at 14:38, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Why can't we keep ClassDescription. Then in addition Behavior is a nice class to have to build strange stuff.
Stef
On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
11151 More changes needed to trait/classes polymorphism https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11151/
That's huge. Soon, we will be able to remove thr ClassDescription and Behavior classes. It makes sense because they are useless in the presence of traits. But do people want it?
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill