Sept. 20, 2011
1:26 p.m.
On 20 Sep 2011, at 15:20, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
Performant method history browsing from Monticello repositories is never going to be a reality. I'd gladly give 100 ⬠(or a beer, whichever is preferred) to someone who can prove me wrong :)
Where you live beers are quite expensive ;-) ! Both points are valid: .changes files that are too big are not very good, having method history of methods is important. Maybe someone should try to find out how many identical entries there are in the current ? It could well be that there are a lot of those due to the way integrations are done ? Sven