That is a very good comment :-) We should not need Text in the kernel and as I tried, the image is able to work without it. So I take my words back, let's keep this update. -- Pavel On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
PAvel, the kernel does not need any of the three actually. Why you need text in the kernel?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
This update significantly breaks the PharoKernel generation because classes in categories Text-Edition and Text-Scanning categories cannot be in this image.
Please reject and rollback this update. We need to split the package into three (Text-Core, Text-Edition, Text-Scanning) and check extension methods ownership. We need working PharoKernel for work on related jobs.
Cheers, -- Pavel
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
20145 -----
Issue 5945:   Nice packaging for Text stuff     http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?can=2&q=5945