On Aug 8, 2013, at 3:03 , Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8 August 2013 14:14, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess that solves the question around the fate of the cog issue tracker: I didn't mean a deprecation or similar, people can continue using it as they want. I put for that links so people can go back and forth between the issue trackers. My unique and good intention was to make those issues more visible.
Thanks, Guillermo. I think everyone understands that your intention was for good, but when you don't inform people properly they tend to think worst (including me)
:)
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
Especially when you end up spamming VM-dev with Cog issue tracker updates saying "Moved to fogbugz". Even with the modified updates, why you'd need to mirror an existing tracker for a related but distinct project into the Pharo tracker, with the synchronization issues that might cause, js still a bit beyond me. Cheers, Henry