Look at Scanner reference to get a feel! I do not call that simple, stable at all. Stef
No more for me.
Introducing more code into Pharo that depends on more parts of Pharo (RPackage, Announcement, Pragma, Ring, RB, Shout, ...) doesn't make it easier to maintain and change Pharo. Or did I misunderstand something about cohesion and coupling? :-)
With that philosophy, we can just declare Pharo as finished and do something else. My point of view is that I invent new abstractions *and than use them* on and for the system itself.
I disagree; I would like a small and stable Pharo in which crazy ideas can be realized. For that I don't need fancy abstractions, but a minimal, simple and absolutely stable system in which I can load and do whatever I want. Maybe this is just me?
Is the current system simple and minimal?
Do you think the Pharo we have is good enough to have a future?
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de