Hi Stef, what would be the suggested API then ? And in announcements, would that change the returned type of some events (MCWorkingCopyCreated / MCWorkingCopyDeleted) ? For Alt-Browser to navigate through the packages, I use MCWorkingCopy and PackageInfo. Is this the way it should be done ? Should I use RPackage instead ? Thierry ________________________________________ De : pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] de la part de Stéphane Ducasse [stephane.ducasse@inria.fr] Date d'envoi : dimanche 5 août 2012 13:28 à : Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Development Objet : [Pharo-project] About the migration from PackageInfo to RPackage Hi guys PackageInfo has a large APi that is often not used. So I would suggest that we reduce the PackageInfo API first because it will lower the stress on RPackage to be offer a compatible interface. All the methods in the compatibility should somehow disappear or only serve as purpose to help temporary backwards compat. What do you think? Stef