On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com
wrote:
SqueakSave seems to bee pretty attractive, does it work in Pharo?
hehehehe I did the same question to him. Actually, I have been sending several private emails with hie because as SqueakSave works for PostgreSQL and MySQL native drivers he had to do a lot of effort. Now, he thought to replace all that stuff with SqueakDBX. Regarding to your question, he told me he didn't tested yet, but wanted to do it before ESUG (he also goes there). But we can ask him again if it was tested. However, take into account this project is still in development, not productive. But sound REALLY interesting. They have a lot of people using it there. It seems to be a very good solution for small/medium app where I don't want to spend time doing mappings, something like active record ?
Shouldn't it be PharoSave? :)
I am sorry I am not agree. I, as a software developer, would like that my project works not only in Pharo but also in all of its forks. SqueakDBX runs in Squeak, Pharo and (I didn't test it) but should work in Cuis (and if not, let me know please) or whatever other squeak fork. I put the name of the abstract class ;) Cheers, Mariano
Regards!
Esteban A. Maringolo
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project