Jan. 14, 2012
12:09 p.m.
On 14 January 2012 12:13, Guido Stepken <gstepken@googlemail.com> wrote:
IS there still a "Image" neccessary in Smalltalk then? Or has this former "design approach" nowerdays rather significant disadvantages? (32 Bit, hanging IO during sync, GC....)
As I see it, image is not something that has to reside in physical RAM, but it is necessary in Smalltalk. -- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net