Dec. 4, 2014
9:09 a.m.
"Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt..." is ? really ? wow I am impressed I thought reimplementing git in smalltalk would be a huge effort. Pharo surprises me once more :) so the problem now is to build the tools on top of it to utilize git ? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
On 04.12.2014, at 09:47, kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
What are the benefits that justify the effort to reimplementing git in smalltalk ?
Iâm not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt...