On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2013-04-04, at 18:51, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4 April 2013 17:38, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2013-04-04, at 16:11, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4 April 2013 15:45, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
really? please, add an issue in the tracker and submit a slice, as everybody else.
calm down, we're just discussing here. I provided code here intentionally for nay-sayers like you to try it and to check if it not breaks something else (your workflow).
Igor, not Esteban's workflow.. OUR WORKFLOW!
Sure sure. Now have you tried the code which i sent if it works/breaks for you?
Or i should spend like 10 minutes filing the issue before figuring that it is unacceptable?
What the fuck do you think the rest does?
|( well the issue is the main entry point. If the code does not work you will be notified VIA the issue => manageed entity
However how you solve this issue right now is by some fuzzy undefined process nobody manages. If you think that this change is worth getting into pharo then you open an issue and attach the SLICE (no changeset, SLICES).
Then the whole machinery starts, people (INCLUDING YOU) look at the issues. Issue get rejected, modified, adapted!
What you show here is IGNORANCE on a higher level. YOU IGNORE A WHOLE DAMN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PEOPLE USE EVERY DAY.
But I think Igor was proposing exactly that what esteban was already arguing agains? In that case an issue tracker entry makes not much sense, we first need to discuss what to do. Marcus