Re: [Pharo-project] Improve pharo modularity: a first step

Oct. 25, 2009

      yes we did the same in VW.

Stef
On Oct 25, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Bernhard Pieber wrote:

> Hi StÃ©phane,
>
> Am 23.10.2009 um 12:50 schrieb StÃ©phane Ducasse:
>> Jannik
>> may be we should have
>>
>> 	PackageCore
>> 	PackageTest
>> 	PackageSetting
>> 	PackageExamples
> A convention we follow here is - for VA Smalltalk code, though:
> - Package (includes all code needed at runtime)
> - PackageDev (includes all code needed only at Development: tests,
> scripts, tools)
>
> This allows for nicely separating runtime packages from those only
> needed for development while keeping the numbers of packages smaller.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Cheers,
> Bernhard
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project