Yep, very good example of faked quality. Making changes at the rate of Pharo is demanding and I understand the will to by-pass some quality rules. But then, any one wanting to give lessons should observe the real usage of the bug tracker and think again, because this is far from being an isolated case.
Nicolas this is always easier to talk than to do :) And you got the prove of it so can we look at the 95% of good practices instead of the 5% wrong? Stef
Nicolas
2013/4/5 Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> On 5 April 2013 17:29, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
There does not seem to be any description in the issue tracker either, or maybe I missed it.
indeed, the record on issue tracker looks very informative. (in the attached).
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: 30022 -----
10032 Integrate new debugger https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10032
Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/DebuggerModel-EstebanLorenzan... http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Debugger-EstebanLorenzan...
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.