Thanks gwenael I will intergrate your fix. Now pharoers what do we do with _ and external code using [ : x instead of [:x for _ Gwenael proposed to have the parser been able to parse and fix the _ into := but also to be able to have a strict parser. For :x we should have a parser that reject : x code. But what do you think On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Gwenael Casaccio wrote:
Hi,
I've discussed with Stephane and may be we can fix all the methods that have : _ instead of := or some methods have [ : myArg ... ] instead of [ :myArg .... ]
So we can use a parser that strictly check that we respect grammar. There is in this mail an attach file that contains the list of the classes and methods that are not corrects.
Cheers, Gwenael Casaccio
<parsingerrors.txt.zip>_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project