On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com
wrote:
Guys..the fact of having to make everything deprecated instead of removing it is really a pain. Now ReferenceStream is not removed but deprecated..meaning that it *should* work. So instead of removing everything I have to change it a lot so that it "still" works but deprecated. Can we just assume that ReferenceStream will be removed in 2.0 please?
In addition, if someone is really worried about ReferenceStream then he can always do a fileout of 1.4 and import it in Pharo 2.0 (and adapt it if necessary)
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok. Perfect. So let's assume DataStream is used only for Motnicello. I will rename it to MCDataStream, move it to Monticello Package and see all what I can remove/clean. I will let you know.
Cheers
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
+1
On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Pavel Krivanek < pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
I think it is a good proposal. Then it can be in separate package or as part of MC package.
I would put DataStream and its friends within the monticello package, and prepend MC to their names. Then, you can clean the resulting classes if you want to.
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com