On 20.09.2008, at 12:03, Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 23:15 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Sep 19, 2008, at 23:02 , Marcus Denker wrote:
On 19.09.2008, at 22:49, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
[...]
Class browser Method finder Message names
Do we need Message names?
hm... I almost never use it, but I know people that do quite often. "Method finder" seems even less important (I've never used it, except for demos ;))
I use it on a daily base. I'm now an average skilled squeaker but still can't remember all the funny method names. The substring search capa- bility of method finder ofter saves my day. I think I would stop using it if browsing a complete protocol would be a little bit more usable than just having all possible methods. Something like that.
I think beginners will use Method finder quite often.
One thing is that "method finder" and "message names" both allow one to search for methods. The "method finder" in addition allows for giving examples in the form 3. 4. 7. So there is definitly the problem of duplicated features here. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- denker@iam.unibe.ch http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker