Matthew
Awesome job guys.
Thanks.
The volume of improvements Pharo has over Squeak really makes me wonder if the latter has any real relevance anymore.
I do not know and in itself this is not our goal. We do not do pharo against Squeak. We do pharo to be able to dream about Smalltalk. We are committed (even more than for 3.9 which I think was a success even if there are some points I would reconsider :)) Now people are welcome to pharo. But Pharo will not be squeak. We want to create a culture where better, faster, more tested, more documented, new, well-designed, not compatible changes are possible and wished. :) I'm still profoundly sad to remove etoy or complex related morphic stuff. May be some people will reimplement some solutions that were already in squeak, but this is the way to go. Cleaning and making the system lean so that we and other can invent their future.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ResultofRelicensing [2] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/LicenseCleanEffort
It looks like you did the relicense perfectly. I'm glad the image I put together was able to help you. I'm sorry I didn't help more.
it was great that you provided the resources. It helped a lot. I could play with the idea and this really lowered the barrier. So be sure that you participated. :) Stef PS: I should check some pending items of what you did (MC1.5.....) just life is too short. PSPS: I hope your master is going well.