On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:
<uncontrolled snipping>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
* Points are summable " { 2@2 . 3@3 } " --> 5@5. But then " 2@2 + 1 " --> 3@3 , so " {} sum " returning 0 would seem to not cause any error in this case.
cheers -ben
but points aren't commutative:
2@2 + 1 " = 3@3" 1 + 2@2 " = 3@2"
Of course, 0 wouldn't be an issue, unless you wanted to access x or y!
-cbc
whoops? 1 + (2@2) = 3@3
cheers -ben
Yeah. Forgot the parenthesis. 1 + 2@2 is the same as (1 + 2) @ 2. My eye sees the closeness of 2@2 as a point - not as a binary message (which it obviously is).
So, never mind. -cbc