Hi, I like the FileSystem-Core-Tests more, because then we can also have FileSystem-Core-Rules and FileSystem-Core-Rules-Tests. But I think that the other way to think about this is that if you want to (un)load all the test from filesystem you just work with FileSystem-Tests and not do it individually for each submodule. However this is just my guess. Uko
On 04 Sep 2016, at 10:17, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Hi guys
Sorry to be that dull and stupid but I do not get why (beside following the seaside convention - and I do not understand it either) why the test package for FileSystem-Core is named FileSystem-Tests-Core
and not just
FileSystem-Core-Tests
like that we could have
FileSystem-Core-Help
FileSystem-Core-Examples
And when we are looking for FileSystem-Core we can see automatically FileSystem-Core-Tests
Now we cannot.
Stef