On May 23, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
Hi!
First I may introduce myself. My name is Guillermo Polito and I'm from Argentina. I've been using Pharo for several months with some colleagues that are already here to teach OOP in the UTN university, and i've been suscribed to this mailing list for some time. But it's my first mail here :P.
Welcome
I participated yesterday in the Pharo Sprint in Argentina and there I had my first look at the issue tracker.
Thanks for your time. I will go over the produced fixes today using Torch :)
And well, it seemed to me to be a little messy. There are lots of issues that aren't properly explained, some of them are duplicated, and they are not well organized.
And you would not imagine if we would not spend a lot of time on it.... This is like a garden.
It would be nice to use the labels googlecode provides to give them some categorization, so we can browse them in a more intelligent way. Maybe we can split the issues in "modules" (like Collection issues, Compiler Issues, Closures Issues, Networking Issues...) or something like that. That will help in avoiding duplications and looking for issues to solve (because I can look for issues in the modules I know the most).
At the moment I will stay looking for issues i can fix or commenting the ones that lacks information :).
Excellent Tagging the entries with semantics is a good idea.
Regards, Guille
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project