Ok :) for now I kept it. And I'm creating an unused category to group the rules that we do not follow. I hope soon that we will develop some good rules to drive our development. Stef On Dec 30, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
Possibly it's useful as a warning to one who comes from a C-syntax language, and might accidentally define a literal array containing some. For example, #(1, 2, 3) - not an error, but not (as the perpetrator might believe) an array containing three integers ;) -- Cheers, Peter.
On 30 dec 2012, at 20:48, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi
I'm going over all the SmallLint rule and extending their rationale and fixing sometimes their default check. Now I'm reading
RBLiteralArrayContainsCommaRule
rationale ^ 'Checks for literal arrays that contain the #, symbol.'
and I have no idea why this would be a problem.
Anybody has an idea?
Stef