On 3 February 2010 10:33, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
I think that this would be the first mail to smalltalk-research
Err, what you mean? All i could say, that this scheme already discussed on squeak-dev couple of years ago... This is exactly the way where i think we should eventually go to. So what is new about it?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Van Cutsem <tvcutsem@vub.ac.be> Date: February 3, 2010 5:13:00 AM GMT+01:00 To: SOFT members <soft@soft.vub.ac.be> Cc: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> Subject: Communicating Event Loops
Hi,
For those interested in concurrency control: last week I gave a presentation about AmbientTalk's concurrency model at a meeting for Javascript industry developers. The presentation was recorded, and if you're interested you can see it here: http://ssjs.pbworks.com/Communicating-Event-Loops
(towards the end there is an interesting discussion about the pros and cons of Erlang-style vs AmbientTalk-style concurrency)
Cheers, Tom
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.