On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eliot Miranda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:
2010/1/20 Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu>:
I guess that vm is not gnuified.
I installed one that was avail for linux, latest one. Didn't built it myself.
I just checked on a "not-that-fast" machine with the binary versions from squeakvm.org:
3.11-3.2135 -> #( '204309656 bytecodes/sec; 7660022 sends/sec' '202852614 bytecodes/sec; 7722256 sends/sec' '205457463 bytecodes/sec; 7785510 sends/sec')
3.10.6 -> #( '380386329 bytecodes/sec; 9512738 sends/sec' '377025036 bytecodes/sec; 10174641 sends/sec' '378978534 bytecodes/sec; 10183725 sends/sec')
The 3.11-3.2135 is not gnuified and I couldn't force cmake to gnuify it (though I didn't try really hard). I think this is an issue that should be solved.
I think the right way is to include John's image level gnuification script and produce an extra engine from within VMMaker. That's what I do. Changing makefiles and/or configurations to choose between the two available interpreters is easier than applying a gnuification scirpt.
With the autotools based build suite interp.c was gnuified if gawk was available, so applying it was pretty easy. I think it's just a bug with the new cmake based build system. The idea of smalltalk based gnuification is really good, so you (not me, because I'm not a vm developer :)) should consider adding it to VMMaker. Levente
Levente
Levente
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project