Yes but why don't we close them with an ensure or something like that. I mean is the logic of the connection making it that we cannot use ensure or this is just a legacy? On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:20 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:
Well somewhere someone needs to close the socket before it is *forgotten*
On 30-Apr-09, at 5:29 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I would like to know why does the system rely on finalisation to release socket Apparently david mentioned that this is the source of huge problems. So what would be the alternative?
Stef
-- = = = = = ====================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = = = ======================================================================
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project