March 14, 2010
11:56 p.m.
On 15.03.2010 00:18, Igor Stasenko wrote:
2010/3/14 Levente Uzonyi<leves@elte.hu>:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
during the sprint niko schwarz and oscar nierstrasz fixed the Set in nil entry. Thanks. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907 Why did you choose Igor's negative tally hack instead of the SetElement version?
I'd prefer to use SetElement, unless there was a decision made, to use negative tally. We had a quite big discussion around it on squeak-dev, and most developers said that SetElement is the way to go, because it is clean, OO-oriented, even if somewhat slower comparing to other approaches.
+1