Aug. 31, 2010
6:57 a.m.
On 31.08.2010 08:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
snip
Yeah, that's why I added the 200000 4KB docs / sec number. I really doubt the conversion will be a significant part of the processing time if what you send out is so small you are able to convert 800k messages per second... It depends on the machine/load/etc. I feel like we already had this discussion over the cull: implementation, and I doubt either of us is going to change their mind, so let's stop here :)
but cull: is in squeak now I think :) I did not look carefully Yes, the discussion wasn't over its usefulness. Like now, it was whether the degree of optimization Levente presented was useful in any real scenarios :)
Cheers, Henry