On Apr 3, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Marcus. I have been testing a little the one click image and I found the following things:
- splash.bmp says release candidate 2. It should be release stable 1.0 or RC3.
This comes from the vm package. I personally honestly don't understand spash-screens. Is windows so slow in loading an image file?
- There is the __MACOSX folder...should be remove. Remember yemuzip ;)
Ok, I will use that.
- In Linux VM, you pass the parameter -encoding latin1 to the VM. Shouldn't this be UTF-8 ? I don't know.
Me neither.
- In /Contents/Resources not only is PharoV10.sources but also SqueakV39.sources. Shouldn't SqueakV39.sources be deleted ? even more it size 16MB!!
deleted.
- The name of the zip of the 1.0 maybe should have a name different than:Pharo-1.0-10515-rc3dev.zip, for example Pharo-1.0-OneClick. Notice the OneClick as part of the name
fixed.
- In linux there are 2 failing test: TestIdenting >> testNewLineLeaveSpacesOnOldLine TestIdenting >> testCR2 They are not new. I even try to ask help and Laurent too some time ago. I would like someone to analyze them. If it is a problem of the test, I would remove them. If there is nothing wrong with the test, I would try to analyze how to fix it.
If anyone has a vm that I should put that is good, I put it. Else I let it like this. I got completely lost with which linux vm to use... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.