Hi Cami. This is a useless email but I just wanted to say that I have also experimented the problem of Monticello being unusable with large package-cache. So...whatever you can do to improve it, I will be very very happy. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com>wrote:
I recently started to hack around Monticello due to very low response times when having a huge package cache.
Now interestingly the FilePlugin primitives for listing files are horrible!
Example: ----------------------------------------------------------- MC often requests a list of all mzc's cached locally: (FileDirectory default / 'package-cache') entries
In my case there are 4300 mczs in the shared package-cache timeToRun yields a nightmarish 2050ms for this, further investigation leads to the fact that most of the time is spent in the file primitive!
Now thats some 2ms for a single directory entry! [Just as a side note, ruby1.8 does the same job in 10ms :D] -----------------------------------------------------------
primLookupEntryIn: fullPath index: index <primitive: 'primitiveDirectoryLookup' module: 'FilePlugin'>
-----------------------------------------------------------
I think we should definitely add another primitive which directly lists the file under a certain path.
Of course this will break compatibility with existing code, but I think the current approach does not scale...
best cami
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com