Because we did not have the time (and nobody took the time to look at the code and write a report for us on the extensions and status of MC1.5 and MC1.6) This is on the pipeline like SUnit+ and KernelExtensions. Now december is a ***terrible*** for researchers in France and I cannot cut myself in more slices than already done. Stef On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Yes but when we load a package we load the package and its extensions and in Pharo we take care about that.
Stef So why do you stick with a broken MC then?
Keith
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project